Showing posts with label movie review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label movie review. Show all posts

Sunday, March 27, 2016

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice ~ A Hit in My Book

It's been a while since my last blog post.  It seems like talking about some iconic characters is a pretty good reason to get back into the swing of blogging.

This weekend the latest superhero movie hit the big screen to huge audiences and vocal critics.  Anyone that knows me knows that I love (most) superhero movies.  I go to the movies to enjoy the cinematic experience and to escape from everyday life.  You can't get much better than a superhero movie to fullfill those expectations.  I love Batman and Superman so I was definately not going to miss Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.

Superhero movies (comic movies in general) typically have large audiences, so there's no doubt this one will too.  Box office numbers will be added to this post after the opening weekend numbers are announced.

Critics are not always so kind to superhero movies.  As a matter of fact, critics seem to have a problem with EVERY movie here lately.  Regardless, I always go in with an open mind ready to decide if I like the movie or not...and almost always I disagree with the critics.  So what did I think of this one?  Read on to find out....

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016)
PG-13 / 151 min / Action, Adventure, Fantasy
Release Date: 03/25/2016
Director: Zack Snyder
Stars: Ben Affleck, Henry Cavill, Amy Adams, Gal Gadot, Jesse Eisenberg, Diane Lane, Laurence Fishburne, Jeremy Irons, Holly Hunter.......

What is this movie about?  Batman and Superman fighting each other, right?  Well, it's a little more complicated than that.  The IMDB page for the movie gives the synopsis as:
Fearing the actions of Superman are left unchecked, Batman takes on the man of steel, while the world wrestles with what kind of a hero it really needs.  With Batman and Superman fighting each other, a new threat, Doomsday, is created by Lex Luthor.  It's up to Superman and Batman to set aside their differences along with Wonder Woman to stop Lex Luthor and Doomsday from destroying Metropolis.

If you have seen Man of Steel you know that Superman caused a whole lot of destruction and many people were killed in collateral damage while he was saving the world.  These actions are what has everyone in such an uproar...especially Batman.  What kind of hero is a man that will cause the kind of devestation that Superman does?  There are a lot of similarities with the actions of Superman to some things happening in our "real" world.  If you don't think there are people, groups, and organizations that are causing devastating collateral damage while trying to do something heroic...well, apparently you don't watch the news or read the newspaper.  It happens frequently...in war, on the streets, in private homes.

Sidenote - The opening scenes of Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice were a little reminiscent of 9/11 to me.  I'm not sure if that was intentional or if it was just something my mind conjured up.

What I didn't like about this movie -

I didn't like the way some parts of the movie was filmed.  While the fight scene was the climax of the movie, as well as having some key foreshadowing moments, parts of it were not easy to watch visually.  Between all the fire being thrown from Superman and Doomsday's eyes there was way too much red.  Part of the time you could see nothing on the screen but the fire.  I would have much preferred to have been able to actually see what was happening.

Lois Lane, the perpetual damsel in distress.  Don't get me wrong...I know that Lois Lane is an important part of the Superman mythology, but she drives me crazy.  There are so many scenes where she comes off as a strong woman to smash it all to pieces by needing a (super)man to save her.  At least Amy Adams does a great job portraying her.

I didn't really care for how Lew Luthor was portrayed.  Jesse Eisenberg was great performance wise, but the entire way that Lex Luthor was protrayed just didn't jive with me.  I will admit that it's been a long time since I've read the comics, but I don't remember Lex Luthor ever acting the same way he did in this movie.  And he's never been portrayed like this in other film versions on the small screen or big screen.  While I'm sure this reinterpretation may be one of the high points for many I think they were trying to make Lex Luthor too much like the Joker, and it didn't work for me.  If you're interested, here's an article you might want to read about this: Zack Snyder on Why He Cast Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor

Now for what I DID like -

Henry Cavill - Clark Kent / Superman

Let me just say that he is an awesome Superman.  There have been many actors play this character, some better than others. I am very happy with Henry Cavill as the adult Superman even though my personal favorite has always been Tom Welling of Smallville...!

I hope their are many, many, more movies with Superman in them because I would like to see Henry Cavill portray him for a long time to come.

Ben Affleck - Bruce Wayne / Batman
 
Oh, where do I begin?  I absolutely LOVE Ben Affleck as Batman!!!!  When it was first announced that he would play Batman there was no shortage of naysayers.  I was not one of them.  I mean, come on folks, have you seen Ben Affleck.  Have you seen Bruce Wayne and Batman in the comics?  Are they not the perfect match??  I knew immediately that he would make a fantastic Batman.  And as a slightly weathered version he is FANTASTIC! I admit it's hard to compete against Christian Bale's version of Batman...but I think Ben Affleck stood up to it just fine.  He wore the cape and cowl very well!!  And the workout scene...my, oh my!!!

I'm just going to go ahead and say that he's my favorite Batman so far.  And thankfully, I'm not alone in those thoughts.  Check out this article: 7 Reasons Ben Affleck is The Best Batman of All-Time.

As for who wins in the fight between Batman and Superman...well, the winner of this movie is....

Gal Gadot - Diana Prince / Wonder Woman
Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman in Batman v Superman.
I was very skeptical when it was announced that Gal Gadot was going to portray Wonder Woman.  I have been a fan of hers for a while but I wasn't sure if the girl I knew as Gisele from the Fast & Furious franchise could pull off this iconic Amazonian warrior.  I know longer have any doubts.  She was great!!  Some of the best scenes from the movie were the ones with her in them.  In fact many think she stole the limelight from Batman and Superman.  Ummm, just maybe she did.  I can't wait to see Wonder Woman in her own feature film.  Finally, Hollywood has found the right woman for the role of Wonder Woman.

Dodge!  Anyone that knows me knows I'm a Mopar girl....and there is plenty of that in this movie.  Would someone please just buy the Jeep Limited edition Renegade Justice special edition for me already!!

So my final vote - I give the movie an A.  

***

I always like to represent when I go to superhero movies, and being conflicted on this one I had to show my appreciation for both Batman and Superman (couldn't find the right Wonder Woman shirt or I would have been wearing that).  My hubby decided on Batman - but he always wears Superman on his sleeve. 



If only he would have worn his Superman costume.... :)

Tuesday, July 28, 2015

Some Movie Critics Need a Southpaw

After seeing the movie Southpaw last weekend the first word that came to my mind was WOW! Since then I have read several reviews and again feel the need to say WOW!  This time, not in a good way though.  While this doesn't completely surprise me - I tend to disagree with the critics - I am saddened that I haven't seen more favorable reviews.  In case you're interested, here's my thoughts on the movie.

Southpaw (2015)
Rated R / 2 hrs. 4 min.
Action / Drama / Sport
Starring: Jake Gyllenhaal, Forest Whitaker, Rachel McAdams, Oona Laurence, Curtis "50 Cent" Jackson, Skylan Brooks, Naomie Harris, Victor Ortiz, Beau Knapp, Miguel Gomez, Dominic Colon, Jose Caraballo, Malcolm M. Mays, ....
Director: Antoine Fuque
Writter: Kurt Sutter



IMDB description: Boxer Billy Hope turns to trainer Tick Willis to help him get his life back on track after losing his wife in a tragic accident and his daughter to child protection services.

That description, while accurate, really doesn't do this movie justice.  I felt such a range of emotions while watching it.  I knew I would like it.  I like action movies.  I like drama movies.  I like sports movies.  Win Win...  I don't realy care for sports in real life but I love movies about sports. It's the first film written by Kurt Sutter...I loved his story telling with Sons of Anarchy so I was certain I would love his story telling with this movie.

Some of the reviews I read said that it was just a knockoff of all the other boxing movies that had been made (i.e. Rocky, Raging Bull, etc...).  I agree and disagree.  Someone once told me that there is not a story out there that hasn't already been told.  This movie is no exception.  It's the typical rags to riches to rags story with a happy ending....but the ride it takes you on in the process is great.

Jake Gyllenhaal plays Billy Hope....and gives an Oscar worthy performance.  I love Jake Gyllenhaal and have seen pretty much everything he's been in.  He is a very versatile actor and has proven once again that he can evoke strong emotions from the audience.  The physical transformation he went through to play this role is amazing.  I read that he did 1000 sit-ups a day, 100 dips, 100 pull-ups, and a lot of cardio to get into this shape!!!


There's nothing about the way he carries his self in this film that would make you doubt that he is a boxer.  And the emotion that he displays makes you feel everything right along with him.  When his wife dies (no, that's not a spoiler, it's in the trailer) it's impossible to not feel the pain while watching his reactions.  When he is winning you feel exhilirated.  When he is losing you feel defeated too.

Rachel McAdams plays Mareen Hope - Billy's wife who he's known since they were orphans.  Loved her in this!!!


Forest Whitaker plays Tick Willis...and also gives an Oscar worthy performance.  As a trainer with his own demons to fight he proves to be just what Billy Hope needs to get him back on track.  And finally, a movie shows someone working with kids that shows them how to be disciplined and respectful!


And I can't not mention Curtis "50 Cent" Jackson.  He was great.  You know his character is just going to do what's best for his business (promoter) but you still can't help but to like him.

The movie is a sports movie but it's main theme is redemption.  The redemption of a champion who lost and found his way back.  The redemption of a father who lost his child and worked through his own demons to get her back.  The redemption of a husband who lost his wife and found a way to keep living without her.

As for the title....Southpaw is a term (in boxing) that basically means when a right handed boxer uses his left fist to deliver a blow - usually the destructive blow because it's unexpected.  I'm sure you can guess since this is the title of the movie that this is exactly what happens in this movie.  While that means the ending is predictable it does not make it any less exciting to watch.  Even though I was humming the Rocky tune in my head with each punch... Even though I knew that Billy Hope would be beat down and would still manage to to get back up... I loved this movie.  For all those critics that likes this movie "high five" to you.   And for all those critics out there that didn't....here's my virtual southpaw.

***
Southpaw Facebook link: https://www.facebook.com/SouthpawMovie
Southpaw Twitter link: https://twitter.com/SouthpawMovie

Thursday, May 21, 2015

29 and Holding... (The Age of Adaline)

It goes without saying that I love movies.  Ron and I recently saw The Age of Adaline while in Mobile, AL.  And should I even mention that it was two romance movies in a row (what is happening to me???)!  Of course this isn't the typical romance and was a very intriguing storyline.

The Age of Adaline
Rated PG-13 / 110 mins / Drama, Romance
Stars: Blake Lively, Michiel Huisman, Harrison Ford, Kathy Baker, Ellen Burstyn...
Director: Lee Toland Krieger
Release date: April 24, 2015

Here's the synopsis according to The Age of Adaline official page:
After miraculously remaining 29 years old for almost eight decades, Adaline Bowman (Blake Lively) has lived a solitary existence, never allowing herself to get close to anyone who might reveal her secret.  But a chance encounter with charismatic philanthropist Ellis Jones (Michiel Huisman) reignites her passion for life and romance.  When a weekend with his parents (Harrison Ford and Kathy Baker) threatens to uncover the truth, Adaline makes a decision that will change her life forever.

You know I don't like to give away any spoilers so I'm not going to go into any more detail about the movie.  But I will tell you what you will be thinking about during AND after seeing this movie (if you're like me that is).  This movie really makes you think about what it would be like to remain at a certain age forever.  I'm not sure why the age of 29 was chosen for Adaline but I have a few thoughts of my own why it's a magical age....an age most people don't want to leave behind.  I can remember clearly when I was 29 - especially the days leading up to my 30th birthday.  It's the only birthday I actually dreaded.  Leaving my 20's seemed like a HUGE step to me.  While being in my 20's wasn't exactly like being a kid...it didn't completely seem like being an adult either (despite my adult responsibilities).  There I was about to enter my 30's head-on!  Lucky for me I have a great husband and great friends that helped make the transition with an amazing surprise party that included my favorite male stripper.  Yes, I said my favorite male stripper - I'll get into that more in another blog. And I guess I really should call him a male exotic dancer right?

What are your thoughts on the transition from your 20s to 30s?  If you could pick an age to stay at forever what would it be?  I've given this a lot of thought...probably more thought than is normal considering my fascination with all things supernatural...and I still haven't come up with the magic age for me.

Go check this movie out (if you haven't already) and let me know your thoughts.  I thought it was a really good movie that was well acted and thought provoking.


Monday, April 13, 2015

The Longest Ride - A Ride Worth Taking

Time for my thoughts on another movie.  :)

The Longest Ride (2015)
Rated PG-13 / 139 mins / Drama, Romance
Released April 10, 2015
Stars: Scott Eastwood, Britt Robertson, Alan Alda, Jack Huston, Oona Chaplin...
Director: George Tillman, Jr.
Based on the novel by Nicholas Sparks
"Two Couples. Two love Stories. One Epic Tale."


I went to see The Longest Ride this past weekend with my hubby at our favorite theater, The Grand at Pier Park.  The movie is based on a novel by the same name written by Nicholas Sparks. Many people know Sparks' work as he has written numerous novels (i.e. The Notebook, Dear John, The Best of Me, Safe Haven.....).

Nicholas Sparks is a fantastic writer!  He has a way of being predictable but still interesting.  In his books you can pretty much bet that there will be love and loss, there is usually someone expressing their love in writing (such as through letters), there is some connection to war, and almost always someone dies.  One thing is for certain - you will need your tissues because there are bound to be tears at some point.  I am always impressed with how Nicholas Sparks manages to be so predictable but still every story is somehow different.  A sign of a great author....make sure the reader knows what they are going to get but shake things up.

Take some time and read some of his many novels.  You can find information about them here:
Nicholas Sparks Official Page

If you are already familiar with his novels you know what to expect from a movie based on of them. Sometimes novels don't translate to the screen as well as they did on the page...especially romance. Everybody has different images in their head while reading...and Hollywood doesn't always make the right choices when casting.  But this movie didn't disappoint.

**Some spoilers ahead**

The Longest Ride follows the story of Luke Collins (played by Scott Eastwood) and Sophia Danko (played by Britt Robertson) as a couple of star-crossed lovers whose lives intertwine with Ira Levinson (played by Alan Alda).  Luke is a former champion bull rider looking to make a comeback after recovering from a traumatic injury in hopes of earning enough money to save the family ranch for his mother (played by Lolita Davidovich).  Sophia is a Wake Forest University art student about to graduate and begin her career in the NYC art world.   Sophia is dragged by her friends to a local rodeo where she sees Luke for the first time.  She later meets him at a party and a relationship begins.

After a date late one evening, they meet Ira when they rescue him (and his box of letters), after he wrecks his vehicle in a thunderstorm.  Sophia (and later Luke) begin spending time with Ira while he recovers in the hospital and later at his home.  During the visits Ira shares stories of his wife Ruth (played by Oona Chaplin), and the love they shared while Sophia reads the letters in the box to Ira. The letters are love letters from Ira to his wife, who also happened to love art.

The movie shows Ira and Ruth's love story through flashbacks played out beautifully by Jack Huston and Oona Chaplin.  The resounding theme of the movie comes in advice from Ira to Sophia - "Love requires sacrifice." All relationships face challenges, but with sacrifice (and hard work) these challenges will result in infinite rewards.  You already know this is a romance so you know there are rewards.  And while the movie is still predictable it is well worth watching and taking the ride with both of these couples.

IMDB page: IMDB - The Longest Ride

Official Site: The Longest Ride

And now just a few things about some of the cast.

I have to mention Alan Alda.  He was fantastic in this movie.  I don't think I ever seen him play a role quite like this.  He's always the funny guy or the man in charge (at least in appearance).  In this movie he was a feeble old man...and he played it beautifully.
You can see his complete acting list here: Alan Alda - IMDB

Jack Huston plays the younger version of Alan Alda's charachter and is fantastic to watch.  He is very easy on the eyes and a brillian actor.
You can see his complete acting list here: Jack Huston - IMDB

Oona Chaplin, who plays Ruth, is also great to watch.  She has a captivating beauty that's not the classic mold.  I'm sure many are already familiar with her from her work on Game of Thrones.
You can see her complete acting list here: Oona Chaplin - IMDB

I was a little concerned about Britt Robertson playing the female lead against Scott Eastwood before seeing the movie.  I really like her as an actree bu she seems so young to me.  Well, since she was born in 1990 she is still young. But Scott Eastwood is only 4 years older than her so the age span isn't really an issue.  And she did a great job in this role.  And the two of them together made a great couple.
You can see her complete acting list here: Britt Robertson - IMDB

And then there is Scott Eastwood....Yep, he's the son of Clint Eastwood...and looks so much like him. I mean...really, really like him.   He was born Scott Clinton Reeves (his mother's maiden name) and made his film debut in Flags of Our Fathers (2006), directed by Clint Eastwood. I read in an article that he continued using the Reeves name when he began his acting career because he didn't want to get jobs just because of who he was.  That's commendable...but there is NO way you can look at this boy and his handsome face and not know who is father is.  I've seen him in some other stuff, including some of my favorite TV shows (Chicago Fire and Chicago P.D.) but he really shows his stuff in this movie (and I'm not ONLY referring to the nice butt shot).  He does a great job acting in this role and I can't wait to see more of him on screen.
You can see his complete acting list here: Scott Eastwood - IMDB

And for your viewing pleasure....

Monday, March 23, 2015

Insurgent – Faction or Factionless?

Insurgent
Rated PG-13 / Adventure, Sci-Fi, Thriller
Release date: March 20, 2015
Stars: Shailene Woodley, Ansel Elgort, Theo James, Jai Courtney, Mekhi Phifer, Miles Teller…

**Some spoilers ahead**

Insurgent, the second movie installment of the Divergent trilogy has now been released in theaters.  Ron and I went to see it this past weekend.  The movie was good – but I definitely could have done without all the side conversations going on.  It seemed like everyone wanted to jibber jabber through the whole movie.  I really don’t understand why people even bother buying a movie ticket if they can’t sit quietly and actually watch the movie! Ok, enough of my rant…now on with my review.

The first installment of this series, Divergent, was released in June 2014.  I watched Divergent prior to reading the books, and while I read A LOT, it was the first movie that really made me want to read the book AFTER seeing the movie. After watching Divergent I HAD to see how this book was written. As an aspiring writer I was extremely curious on how what I had just seen was translated from page to screen.  I needed to see how the author played this story out on page.  I’m happy to say I was pleased with both versions.  I blogged about this last year as well – you can read that entry here:

For those not familiar with the Divergent series here’s a short summary.  The series is a trilogy written by Veronica Roth and includes Divergent, Insurgent, and Allegiant.  There are also a few short stories you can read in addition.  The series follows Beatrice “Tris” Prior (played by Shailene Woodley in the movies) who lives in a dystopian Chicago.  Everyone is divided into factions based on particular virtues: Abnegation (the selfless), Amity (the peaceful), Candor (the honest), Dauntless (the brave), and Erudite (the intelligent).  Individuals must decide which faction they will devote their life to at the Choosing Ceremony on their 16th birthday, after which they are put through a highly competitive initiation process in order to remain in their chosen faction.  Those that don’t pass their initiation into their chosen factions become Factionless and live their life in poverty and violence.   

In Divergent Tris surprises everyone when she chooses Dauntless (she grew up in Abnegation).  The story continues to explore Tris’ transformation into the Dauntless world as she undergoes rigorous physical and psychological tests…not to mention an attachment to her Dauntless leader, Four (played by Theo James).  While going through this battery of tests Tris finds out that she is “divergent”, someone who has elements of all the factions and is considered dangerous, so she must keep this information secret. 

Insurgent continues the story with conflict between the factions.  Tris and Four, along with a group of their friends and associates, are on the run from the Erudite ruler (played brilliantly by Kate Winslet) who wants to kill all of the divergents.

The movie is different than the book – but of course I knew it would be.  Hollywood has a habit of changing things when making the transition from page to screen.  I’m not going to go into any detail on the differences between the book and movie here.  If you’re really interested all you need to do is Google it.  Trust me there are many blogs and articles on this subject.  I know because I Googled it.  Instead I want to discuss what really interests me about this series.

While watching these movies and reading the books I couldn’t help but to wonder which of the factions I would fit into…or which one I should fit into.  Is it logical to think that society would function better divided into self-contained factions, or would conflict still arise amongst them?  I think it would be an issue.  Just because people seem like minded doesn’t mean that they will actually get along.  In fact, many like-minded people actually do not get along with each other at all.  And I’m sure you’ve heard the phrase “opposites attract”.  If we spent our time surrounded only by people who were like us how fulfilling would our lives really be?

Segregation has been done over and over and has really never been successful…no matter the reason behind the segregating.  In this series the groups were put together based on their virtues.  The assumption is that you should be in the group that best suits your skills.  But can you really pick just one of these groups?  I’ve listed a description of them again below and have included each factions manifesto as noted from http://www.divergentfans.com/page/faction-manifestos. I know it’s a little lengthy…but I think this will give you a better picture of what each faction is like. 


Abnegation (The Selfless) – This faction values the needs of other above the needs of oneself. 
I will be my undoing If I become my obsession.
I will forget the ones I love If I do not serve them.
I will war with others If I refuse to see them.
Therefore I choose to turn away From my reflection, To rely not on myself But on my brothers and sisters, To project always outward Until I disappear.*
(*Some members add a final line: “And only God remains.” That is at the discretion of each member, and is not compulsory.) 

Erudite (The Intelligent) – This faction values knowledge.
We submit the following statements as truth:
“Ignorance” is defined not as stupidity but as lack of knowledge. Lack of knowledge inevitable leads to disconnect among people with differences. Lack of understanding leads to a disconnect among people with differences. Disconnection among people with differences leads to conflict. Knowledge is the only logical solution to the problem of conflict. Therefore, we propose that in order to eliminate conflict, we must eliminate the disconnect among those with differences by correcting the lack of understanding that arises from ignorance with knowledge. The areas in which people must be educated are:
1. Sociology
So that the individual understands how society at large functions.
2. Psychology
So that the individual understands how a person functions within the society.
3. Mathematics
So that the individual is prepared for further study in science, engineering, medicine, and technology.
4. Science
So that the individual better understands how the world operates. So that the individual’s study in other areas is supplemented. So that as many individuals as possible area prepared to enter the fields devoted to innovation and progress
5. Communication
So that the individual knows how to speak and write clearly and effectively.
6. History
So that the individual understands the mistakes and successes that have led us to this point. So that the individual learns to emulate those successes and avoid those mistakes. Leaders must not be chosen base on charisma, popularity, or ease of communication, all of which are misleading and have little to do with the efficiency of a political leader. An objective standard must be used in order to determine who is best fit to lead. That standard will be an intelligence test, administered to all adults when the present leader reaches fifty-five or begins to decline is function in a demonstrable way. Those who, after rigorous studying, do not meet a minimum intelligence requirement will be exiled from the faction so they can be made useful. This is not an act of elitism but rather one of practicality: Those who are not intelligent enough to engage in the roles assigned to us— roles that require a considerable mental capacity—are better suited to menial work than to faction work. Menial work is required for the survival of society, and is therefore just as important as faction work. Information must always be made available to all faction members at all times. The withholding of information is punishable by reprimand, imprisonment, and, eventually, exile. Every question that can be answered must be answered or at least engaged. Illogical thought processes must be challenged when they arise. Wrong answers must be corrected. Correct answers must be affirmed. If an answer to a question is unclear, it must be put to debate. All debates require evidence. Any controversial thought or idea must be supplemented by evidence in order to reduce the potential for conflict. Intelligence must be used for the benefit, and not to the detriment, of society. Those who use intelligence for their own personal gain or to the detriment of others have not properly borne the responsibility of their gift, and are not welcome in our faction. It bears repeating: Intelligence is a gift, not a right. It must not be wielded not as a weapon but as a tool for the betterment of others.


Dauntless (The Brave) – This faction is made up of brave, fearless individuals.
We believe that cowardice is to blame for the world’s injustices.
We believe that peace is hard-won, that sometimes it is necessary to fight for peace. But more than that: We believe that justice is more important than peace.
We believe in freedom from fear, in denying fear the power to influence our decisions. We believe in ordinary acts of bravery, in the courage that drives one person to stand up for another.
We believe in acknowledging fear and the extent to which it rules us. We believe in facing that fear no matter what the cost to our comfort, our happiness, or even our sanity.
We believe in shouting for those who can only whisper, in defending those who cannot defend themselves.
We believe, not just in bold words but in bold deeds to match them. We believe that pain and death are better than cowardice and inaction because we believe in action.
We do not believe in living comfortable lives. We do not believe that silence is useful.
We do not believe in good manners.
We do not believe in empty heads, empty mouths, or empty hands.
We do not believe that learning to master violence encourages unnecessary violence.
We do not believe that we should be allowed to stand idly by. We do not believe that any other virtue is more important than bravery.

Amity (The Peaceful) – This faction values peace and harmony above all else.
Conversations of Peace
Trust
A son says to his mother: “Mother, today I fought with my friend.”
His Mother says: “Why did you fight with your friend?”
“Because he demanded something of me, and I would not give it to him.”
“Why did you not give it to him?”
“Because it was mine.”
“My son, you now have your possessions, but you do not have your friend. Which would you rather have?”
“My friend.”
“Then give freely, trusting that you will also be given what you need.”
Self-Sufficiency
Daughter says to her Father: “Father, today I fought with my friend.”
Her Father says: “Why did you fight with your friend?”
“Because she insulted me, and I was angry.”
“Why were you angry?”
“Because she lied about me” (In some versions: “Because I was hurt by her words.”)
“My daughter, did your friend’s words change who you are?”
“No.”
“Then do not be angry. The opinions of others cannot damage you.”
Forgiveness
A husband says to his wife: “Wife, today I fought with my enemy.”
“His Wife says: “Why did you fight with your enemy?”
“Because I hate him.”
“My husband, why do you hate him?”
“Because he wronged me.”
“The wrong is past. You must let it rest where it lies.”
Kindness
A Wife says to her Husband: “Husband, today I fought with my enemy.”
Her Husband says: “Why did you fight with your enemy?”
“Because I spoke cruel words to her.”
“My wife, why did you speak cruel words to her?”
“Because I believed them to be true.”
“Then you must no longer think cruel thoughts. Cruel thoughts lead to cruel words, and hurt you as much as they hurt your target.”
(The following section was part of the original manifesto, but was later removed.)
Involvement
One friend says to Another: “Friend, today I fought with my enemy.”
The Other Friend says: “Why did you fight with your enemy?”
“Because they were about to hurt you.”
“Friend, why did you defend me?”
“Because I love you.”
“Then I am grateful.”

Candor (The Honest) – This faction values honesty above all else.
Dishonesty Is Rampant.
Dishonesty Is Temporary.
Dishonesty Makes Evil Possible.
As it stands now, lies pervade society, families, and even the internal life of the individual. One group lies to another group, parents lie to children, children lie to parents, individuals lie to themselves. Dishonesty has become so integral to the way we relate to one another that we rarely find ourselves in authentic relationships with others. Our dark secrets remain our own. Yet it is our secrets that cause conflict. When we are dishonest with the people around us, we begin to hate ourselves for lying; when we are dishonest with ourselves, we can never attempt to correct the flaws we find within us, the flaws we are so desperate to hide from our loved ones, the flaws that make us lie. What has become clear is that lies are just a temporary solution to a permanent problem. Lying to spare a person’s feelings, even when the truth would help them to improve, damages them in the long run. Lying to protect yourself lasts for so long before the truth emerges. Like a wild animal, the truth is too powerful to remain caged. These are examples we clearly see in our own lives, yet we fail to understand that they do not just apply to the dynamic between ourselves and our neighbors, or ourselves and our friends. What is society but a web of individual-to-individual relationships? And what is conflict except one person’s dark secret crashing into another person’s dark secret? Dishonesty is a veil that shields one person from another. Dishonesty allows evil to persist, hidden from eyes of those who would fight it. Dishonesty Leads to Suspicion. Suspicion Leads to Conflict. Honesty Leads to Peace. We have a vision of an honest world. In this world, parents do not lie to their children, and children do not lie to their parents do not lie to their parents; friends do not lie to one another; spouses do not lie to each other. When we are asked our opinions we are free to give them without having to consider any other responses. When we engage in conversation with others, we do not have to evaluate their intentions, because they are transparent. We have no suspicion, and no one suspects us. And most of all - yes, above all else - we are free to expose our dark secrets because we know the dark secrets of our neighbors, our friends, our spouses, our children, our parents, and our enemies. We know that while we are flawed in a unique way, we are not unique because we are flawed. Therefor we can be authentic. We have no suspicions. And we are at peace with those around us. Truth ‘Makes ‘Us ‘Transparent. ‘Truth Makes Us Strong. Truth Makes Us Inextricable We will raise our children to tell the truth. We will do this by encouraging them to speak their minds at every moment. For the child, withholding words is the same as lying. We will be honest with our children even at the expense of their feelings. The only reason people cannot bear honesty now is because they were not raised hearing the truth about themselves, and they can’t stand to. If children are raised to hear both honest praise and honest criticism, they will not be so fragile as to crumble beneath the scrutiny of their peers. A life of truth makes us strong. Adulthood will be defined as a time at which each member of society is capable of bearing every other member’s dark secrets, just as every other member will be subjected to The Full Unveiling in which every hidden part of their life is laid bare before their fellow members. They, too, will see the hidden parts of their fellow members’ lives. In this way we bear one another’s secrets. In this way we become inextricable. Truth Makes Us Inextricable.

And then there are the Factionless – This group is made up of those that do not fit in any of the social classes listed above. In this series it is described as being homeless and most that are factionless suffer in many ways because they do not have the same resources as the other factions.

If you were in Veronica Roth’s Divergent world where do you think you would best fit in?  Would you fit in just one of these factions, or do you have traits of more than one, or all?

If you want to dive in further to this world here are just a few links to get you started on your journey.  I find it fascinating.  The books, and the movies so far, have been very entertaining, and have lots of ideals that run parallel to the real world.

IMDB link: Insurgent IMDB link



Goodreads link: Insurgent book

Amazon link: Insurgent on Amazon


Friday, March 20, 2015

The Gunman - A Sure Shot For Me

The Gunman 
Rated R / Action, Crime, Drama
Stars: Sean Penn, Idris Elba, Jasmine Trinca, Javier Bardem, Ray Winstone, Mark Rylance…


**spoilers ahead**

With two new movies out this weekend Ron and I decided to start early and take in one of them on Thursday night.  Last night we went to see the new Sean Penn flick The Gunman.  The movie is based on the 2002 novel The Prone Gunman written by Jean-Patrick Manchette. 

The Gunman is an action movie and in many ways is presented like every other action movie I’ve seen – which is not a negative thing in my opinion.  Sean Penn, who is now 54 years old, looks great physically!  He has obviously been spending lots of time in the gym as evidenced by his buff and toned body (you can get a good look at it during a surfing scene later in the movie – yes, I said a surfing scene).  My only complaint about him in the entire movie is his continual need to smoke a cigarette!

Sean Penn plays Jim Terrier.  Jim is a private security contractor who also happens to be a sniper on a mercenary assassination team in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).  The movie starts in 2006 with images that I would definitely have rather not seen…but were important for the theme of the movie.  Thankfully the images of starving babies, war, and other atrocities were brief as they were extremely hard to look at.  While showing these images there were also clips from news programs as well as voice over discussing things like the private security contractors, world’s deadliest conflict, rape, vast mineral wealth, and meeting the demands of the Western world.  From this you know right up front that there will be lots of political overtones throughout the movie.

Jim’s girlfriend Annie is played by Jasmine Trinca, and exotic and beautiful woman.  Annie is an aid worker at a local clinic – where she gets to see firsthand the results of all of the atrocities in the Congo.  From the way they look at each other it’s obvious that Jim and Annie are deeply in love…something that seems to be a problem for Jim’s colleague, Felix (played by Javier Bardem).

During an operation, which I’m sure was supposed to be one of those “good for the country” operations but seems more like a “good for greed” operation, Jim kills the minister of mines of the Congo on the orders of an unknown client, unknown to everyone but Felix anyway.  As a condition of the successful operation Jim must immediately leave the Congo and his girlfriend Annie behind.  But don’t worry about Annie…Jim asked Felix to look after her so she’s bound to be in good hands…right?

Eight years later Jim returns to the Congo, but this time is not there as a private security contractor; instead he works for an aid group providing safe drinking water.  See, Jim is a good guy after all.  Jim is still having flashbacks from the minister’s assassination in which he pulled the trigger.  The flashbacks are accompanied by horrible headaches (as they should) which we later find out is because he has “post-concussion syndrome”.  While I don’t doubt that he would have these flashbacks, I do doubt that a person that can accomplish this kind of assassination would not have done MANY other things that would also be causing him duress, yet we never see flashbacks of those.

While working with the aid group the group is attacked by locals looking for “the white man”.  Jim manages to evade death (after killing most of the others in true action star style) and then commences his trek to find out who sent them.  He is certain it has something to do with the DRC assassination so he hunts down some of his old colleagues in London, Terry (played by Mark Rylance), who is now an executive at the security firm they both used to work for, and Stanly (played by Ray Winstone), who appears to be a beach bum.  You know that one of these is going to end up being a bad guy for sure.

Jim eventually ends up in Barcelona, where he finds that Felix and Annie are now married.  This seemed to surprise him but I doubt that anyone in the audience was surprised by this. After some “as expected” confrontations between the three of them, and some adultery between Jim and Annie (you knew that was going to happen right?), the action (and violence) in the movie really starts to heat up. 

It turns out that Jim has been keeping journals containing evidence of all the things the security company, including himself, did over the years.  Needless to say, the security company doesn’t want this information to come out….enter Interpol.   Of course Interpol is very interested in obtaining this information and they have the perfect agent for the job – Idris Elba.  Idris Elba really doesn’t do a lot in this movie…but he still looks good just standing there.

The remainder of the movie is full of action sequences, including a bull fight, leading up to the “happily ever after” ending.  Ok, so maybe I left out some significant scenes…I don’t need to tell you everything, do I?  You really need to watch this movie to truly appreciate the action scenes. 

I’ve seen some bad press about this movie criticizing everything from the Africans in the film not having any lines to speak to Sean Penn’s performance to the degrading of women to the predictable storyline.  But I enjoyed it.  I knew exactly what to expect when walking into the theater…an action film with political overtones.  I thought Sean Penn’s performance was great.  The movie actually kind of reminded me of the Bourne movies and the Taken movies….and I wouldn’t mind seeing other movies with the Jim Terrier character in them.  So even though some may not like it…it was a sure shot for me. 

You can find the movie info on IMDB here:

And the official site here:

And if you want to read the novel it was based on you can get that here:



  

Sunday, March 8, 2015

Chappie Did Not Make Me Happy



This weekend my husband and I went to the movies and saw the new Sci-fi movie Chappie.  Being a Hugh Jackman fan, as well as a Sci-fi fan, I expected to enjoy this movie.  Boy was I wrong!  I was extremely disappointed in it on so many levels.

The description of the movie according to IMDB is:  In the near future, crime is patrolled by an oppressive mechanized police force. When one police droid, Chappie, is stolen and given new programming, he becomes the first robot with the ability to think and feel for himself. 

The link to the IMDB page is here:IMDB - Chappie 

The link to the official page is here: Chappie Official Page

The movie was written and directed by Neill Blomkamp (District 9)…yet one more reason to expect it to be a good sci-fi flick.  

The idea of a robot learning to think and feel for himself is actually very intriguing to me.  With all the advances in technology recently this seems like something that could definitely be on the horizon….and could actually be a good thing on many levels.  Blomkamp really missed the mark on telling this story though. 

**Spoilers ahead**

The movie is set in Johannesburg, South Africa in the near future at a time when order is maintained largely by a robotic police force called Scouts of which Chappie is one of.  Chappie is injured early on and scheduled for destruction.  Deon Wilson, the developer of the Scouts (played by Dev Patel) wants to test a new program on Chappie (to see if robots can actually learn to think and feel on their own) but is denied by his company’s CEO (played by Sigourney Weaver).  So what does Wilson do?  He steals the robot out of the scrap pile to test on his own and as he is leaving with the robot he is carjacked by some street thugs (played by the rap group Die Antwoord).

This is where the movie went downhill to me.  The street thugs began teaching Chappie their way of life….the criminal way of life.  In the next segment of the film Chappie learns how to talk and walk like a gangster, how to use a gun, how to use a knife, how to harm humans (and repeadedtly does so), how to steal cars, etc…generally, he is taught how to be a thug.   And of course, there is the unnecessary dog fight scene.  They didn’t actually show the dog’s fighting but they implied it and they did show dogs dead.   

Hugh Jackman’s character, Vincent, has also developed a robot, The Moose, which is operated by a human wearing a helmet that links him to the robot.  The Moose is loaded with armaments and extremely lethal with Vincent at the helm.

The altercation with The Moose and Chappie, and all the humans in the crossfire, is over-the-top violent….to the point of one person literally being cut in half by The Moose.

Anyone that knows me knows that I’m not easily offended by violence in movies.  I prefer to watch crime movies, thrillers, action…you get the idea.  But I have a huge problem when the violence in the movie is done in such a manner that it actually teaches people, especially children, to be violent just for the sake of being violent. 

This movie was rated R – something definitely not made clear through the trailers. In fact the trailer made the movie seem as if it was more geared for children…WRONG. 

While I am not big on censorship, I would strongly recommend that parents use caution when allowing their children to watch this movie.  The lessons they will learn from this movie are simply how to be (or at least act) like a thug.  I told this to Ron while we were watching the movie and my point was proven as soon as we walked out of the theater.  There was a group of children (probably all under age 10) that watched it with one adult.  They left in front of us and when leaving the theater were talking about how much they liked the movie while pretending to hold guns and talk about shooting.  Yes, I know this is something that is shown to children everyday…on television, movies, video games, books, etc….but there really has to be a line drawn somewhere.


I can’t seem to find the right words to really express how much this movie disappointed me.   And I don’t want to be a voice for censorship.  I really do think that people should make up their own minds.  I would hope that all parents that allow their children to see this movie also take the time to sit down with them and discuss it.  And again I will say…Chappie did NOT make me happyL